![reaper vs lmms reaper vs lmms](https://allsoundlab.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/1.png)
There are quite a few "gotchas" regarding getting this working on Macs, and it's taken me a long while to get anything reliable. I think the Windows versions are the next best supported. LMMS was primarily developed for Linux, but most of us don't use that regularly, or have a dedicated Linux machine. Accurate track timing is a possible problem. This isn't always such a limitation, but it may be. It doesn't do audio editing directly (currently), so audio tracks have to be imported, and typically they would be edited in an external editor.
![reaper vs lmms reaper vs lmms](https://www.saashub.com/images/app/screenshots/154/7yjoz4zapcf8/landing-medium.jpg)
#Reaper vs lmms for mac#
It's not clear that this is always possible - for example some versions of LMMS for Mac may not have been able to support VSTs.
![reaper vs lmms reaper vs lmms](https://fixthephoto.com/images/content/fl-studio-interface-fl-studio-vs-logic-pro-x.png)
Some synthesisers can be imported, depending on the version of LMMS - for example as VSTs. There are several synthesisers built in - though perhaps not as good as the software synthesisers built in or It's reasonably good at providing a multi-track environment for electronic music and synthesisers. Some people have a seemingly idealogical preference for Open Source software and/or an aversion to commercial (paid for ) software. There are only a few people working on it, so some things are limited - maybe. It is open source software, and I assume has been developed by volunteers. LMMS is a curious beast - which has been recommended in some other places, but not appreciated in others.